I contradicted it by pointing out that reality doesn't back your statement up. Small RBs don't get injured at any higher rate than the general population of RBs. I'm using the criteria you set: I then pointed out to you that Blount averages less than 4 yards per carry, and then pointed to another metric that shows his yards after contact, and that he is well below Riddick in that metric. Yet you continue to contradict your own criteria -- still suggesting that there is a wide gap in the capabilities of these two backs. And I find that puzzling, so I am asking questions to clarify. If it seems like I'm patronizing, I am again using your assertion that "I guess the unintelligent needs a definition ... " I'm obviously not "intelligent" enough to see whatever it is you're seeing, so I am seeking your enlightenment.